Package rpminstall-tests
Source package: rpminstall-tests
Version: 1.1.2-alt0.M70T.3
Category: Development/Tools
Report package bug
Version: 1.1.2-alt0.M70T.3
Build time: Mar 7, 2019, 04:42 AM
in the task #223570
Report package bug
Gear: https://git.altlinux.org/gears/r/rpminstall-tests.git?a=tree;hb=…
Home page: http://git.altlinux.org/people/imz/packages/rpminstall-tests.git
Home page: http://git.altlinux.org/people/imz/packages/rpminstall-tests.git
License: GPLv2+
Summary: Tests for rpm: how it interprets packages when installing
Description:
Summary: Tests for rpm: how it interprets packages when installing
Description:
Tests for rpm: how it interprets packages when installing. Now, it tests how various forms of constraints (Requires, Conflicts, Obsoletes) are interpreted when they are installed together with packages with various forms of matching Provides. More tests can appear.
List of rpms provided by this srpm:
rpminstall-tests (noarch)
rpminstall-tests-checkinstall (noarch)
rpminstall-tests (noarch)
rpminstall-tests-checkinstall (noarch)
Maintainer: Ivan Zakharyaschev
List of contributors:
Ivan Zakharyaschev
ACL: Ivan Zakharyaschev, @everybody
Last changes:List of contributors:
Ivan Zakharyaschev
ACL: Ivan Zakharyaschev, @everybody
March 4, 2019 Ivan Zakharyaschev 1.1.2-alt0.M70T.3 |
- Unmarked XFAIL: non-critical unrealistic obsoleting a specific disttag. |
March 4, 2019 Ivan Zakharyaschev 1.1.2-alt0.M70T.2 |
- Build for t7, c7. - Some tests skipped because the current rpmbuild doesn't produce Provides: N = E:V-R:D. (But we are still able to test how deps with disttags are satisfied with the help of virtual Provides.) - The strict upgradability order is assumed to work correctly in all cases (so removed the XFAIL marks). |
Feb. 28, 2019 Ivan Zakharyaschev 1.1.2-alt1 |
- Tests for upgradability according to the disttag. (XFAIL: incorrect behavior in rpm-4.13.0.1-alt5, but different in 4.0.4-alt101.M80P.5; XFAIL: fails in non-standard configuration without honor_buildtime.) - Extended the tests for the overlapping of constraints and packages with cases of "elusive deps" (a dependency with a release, but no epoch: should it match any epoch? Marked XFAIL for now.) |