Package rpminstall-tests

Source package: rpminstall-tests
Version: 1.1.2-alt0.M70T.3
Build time:  Mar 7, 2019, 04:42 AM
 in the task #223570
Category: Development/Tools
Report package bug
License:  GPLv2+
Summary:  Tests for rpm: how it interprets packages when installing
Description: 
Tests for rpm: how it interprets packages when installing.

Now, it tests how various forms of constraints (Requires, Conflicts, Obsoletes)
are interpreted when they are installed together with packages with
various forms of matching Provides.

More tests can appear.
List of rpms provided by this srpm: 
rpminstall-tests (noarch)
rpminstall-tests-checkinstall (noarch)
Maintainer: Ivan Zakharyaschev
List of contributors: 
Ivan Zakharyaschev

ACL: Ivan Zakharyaschev, @everybody
    1. rpm-build-licenses
Last changes:
March 4, 2019 Ivan Zakharyaschev 1.1.2-alt0.M70T.3
- Unmarked XFAIL: non-critical unrealistic obsoleting a specific disttag.
March 4, 2019 Ivan Zakharyaschev 1.1.2-alt0.M70T.2
- Build for t7, c7.
- Some tests skipped because the current rpmbuild doesn't produce
  Provides: N = E:V-R:D. (But we are still able to test how deps with disttags
  are satisfied with the help of virtual Provides.)
- The strict upgradability order is assumed to work correctly in all cases
  (so removed the XFAIL marks).
Feb. 28, 2019 Ivan Zakharyaschev 1.1.2-alt1
- Tests for upgradability according to the disttag. (XFAIL: incorrect
  behavior in rpm-4.13.0.1-alt5, but different in 4.0.4-alt101.M80P.5;
  XFAIL: fails in non-standard configuration without honor_buildtime.)
- Extended the tests for the overlapping of constraints and packages
  with cases of "elusive deps" (a dependency with a release, but no epoch:
  should it match any epoch? Marked XFAIL for now.)

Back to Top